WTF is Project 2025?!
Donald Trump and the Republican Party have a plan for what they want to do to us if they win in November.
It's up to us to fight back to protect our future and our democracy.
🇺🇸
Attacks on Fundamental Rights and Personal Freedoms
Controlling What You Read and Watch Online
This plan calls for making all pornography illegal. This would mean the government would decide what you can and cannot watch on the internet, even in your own home. Not only is this a blatant violation of the First Amendment right to free speech, but it would also be impossible to enforce. Who would decide what is and isn't pornography? How could the government monitor the internet usage of every American?
Page: 6
Quote: Pornography...has no claim to First Amendment protection.
Highlight: has no claim to First Amendment protection
Explanation: This statement is demonstrably false. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the right to produce and consume adult content as protected speech under the First Amendment. This proposal would grant the government the power to censor any content it deems offensive, setting a dangerous precedent for restricting other forms of free expression.
Page: 6
Quote: Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.
Highlight: should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.
Explanation: This is an extreme and unrealistic proposal. Not only would it be impossible to enforce a ban on pornography given the internet's vastness, but it would also criminalize millions of Americans for engaging in legal and consensual activities.
Page: 38
Quote: Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.
Highlight: Pornography should be outlawed
Explanation: This plan calls for the government to regulate and censor pornography, raising First Amendment concerns about freedom of speech.
Rolling Back Women's Rights and Access to Abortion
This plan promotes numerous restrictions on abortion, including making it harder to access abortion pills and potentially defunding healthcare providers that offer abortion services. This would take away women's right to make their own decisions about their bodies and their healthcare.
Page: 38
Quote: Conservatives...should push as hard as possible to protect the unborn in every jurisdiction in America.
Highlight: should push as hard as possible to protect the unborn in every jurisdiction in America.
Explanation: This plan calls for pursuing a federal ban on abortion. Since overturning Roe v. Wade, they are now scheming to create nationwide laws to take away women's right to control their own bodies and access to life saving healthcare.
Page: 492
Quote: Now that the Supreme Court has acknowledged that the Constitution contains no right to an abortion, the FDA is ethically and legally obliged to revisit and withdraw its initial approval, which was premised on pregnancy being an “illness” and abortion being “therapeutically” effective at treating this “illness.”
Highlight: revisit and withdraw its initial approval
Explanation: The FDA approval process for Mifepristone, the abortion pill, followed established scientific and regulatory protocols. This statement falsely claims the process was "illegal" to justify a political agenda of restricting access to abortion.
Page: 38
Quote: Conservatives in the states and in Washington, including in the next conservative Administration, should push as hard as possible to protect the unborn in every jurisdiction in America. In particular, the next conservative President should work with Congress to enact the most robust protections for the unborn that Congress will support while deploying existing federal powers to protect innocent life and vigorously complying with statutory bans on the federal funding of abortion.
Highlight: the most robust protections for the unborn
Explanation: This plan calls for the most aggressive anti-abortion policies possible, effectively banning abortion in America.
Page: 510
Quote: Because liberal states have now become sanctuaries for abortion tourism, HHS should use every available tool, including the cutting of funds, to ensure that every state reports exactly how many abortions take place within its borders, at what gestational age of the child, for what reason, the mother’s state of residence, and by what method. It should also ensure that statistics are separated by category: spontaneous miscarriage; treatments that incidentally result in the death of a child (such as chemotherapy); stillbirths; and induced abortion. In addition, CDC should require monitoring and reporting for complications due to abortion and every instance of children being born alive after an abortion. Moreover, abortion should be clearly defined as only those procedures that intentionally end an unborn child’s life. Miscarriage management or standard ectopic pregnancy treatments should never be conflated with abortion.
Highlight: cutting of funds
Explanation: This plan threatens to withhold federal healthcare funding from states that do not comply with its anti-abortion agenda.
Denying Healthcare for Transgender Americans
This plan seeks to ban gender-affirming care, including medical treatments for transgender youth. This means that transgender individuals would be denied access to essential medical care simply because of who they are. It's discriminatory, cruel, and could have devastating consequences for the health and well-being of transgender Americans.
Page: 37
Quote: Allowing parents or physicians to 'reassign' the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.
Highlight: 'reassign' the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end.
Explanation: Gender-affirming care for transgender youth is supported by major medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association. This plan labels it as "child abuse," ignoring the scientific consensus and jeopardizing the health and well-being of transgender youth.
Page: 65
Quote: Entrance criteria for military service...should be based on the needs of those positions. Exceptions for individuals...suffering from gender dysphoria should be removed, and those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service.
Highlight: Exceptions for individuals...suffering from gender dysphoria should be removed, and those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service.
Explanation: This proposal is discriminatory and contradicts the policies of the U.S. military. Transgender individuals have been serving openly in the military since 2016, and their service is supported by military leaders. This policy would force transgender Americans out of military service simply for being who they are.
Page: 527
Quote: The CDC should immediately end its collection of data on gender identity, which legitimizes the unscientific notion that men can become women (and vice versa) and encourages the phenomenon of ever-multiplying subjective identities.
Highlight: end its collection of data on gender identity
Explanation: This prevents researchers and policymakers from gathering data on gender identity, which could have a negative impact on healthcare policies and access to essential services for transgender Americans.
Allowing Discrimination Based on Religious Beliefs
This plan expands religious exemptions in social programs, allowing faith-based organizations to deny services to people based on their sexual orientation, gender identity, or religious beliefs. This would create a two-tiered system in which some Americans are denied services simply because of who they are.
Page: 36
Quote: The next conservative President must make the institutions of American civil society hard targets for woke culture warriors.
Highlight: hard targets for woke culture warriors
Explanation: The language here is coded and inflammatory. "Woke culture warriors" is a dog whistle term used by the right to demonize anyone who advocates for social justice and inclusivity. This plan seeks to shield religious organizations from accountability when they discriminate against individuals based on their sexual orientation, gender identity, or religious beliefs. It would permit discrimination in the name of religious freedom.
Page: 514
Quote: For the sake of child well-being, programs should affirm that children require and deserve both the love and nurturing of a mother and the play and protection of a father.
Highlight: children require and deserve both the love and nurturing of a mother and the play and protection of a father.
Explanation: This statement is discriminatory and ignores the reality of diverse family structures. Millions of children are raised by single parents, same-sex couples, grandparents, and other caregivers. This proposal suggests that these children are somehow disadvantaged because their families do not fit a narrow, traditional definition.
Page: 53
Quote: The next Administration must stand up for American ideals, American families, and American culture—all things in which, thankfully, most Americans still believe.
Highlight: American ideals, American families, and American culture
Explanation: This statement suggests a narrow definition of American values that excludes the rights and protections of marginalized groups.
Page: 175
Quote: Eliminate T and U visas. Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit.
Highlight: Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit.
Explanation: This statement is shockingly callous and mischaracterizes the purpose of these visas. T visas are for victims of human trafficking, and U visas are for victims of certain crimes who have assisted law enforcement. Eliminating these visas would re-victimize vulnerable individuals and discourage cooperation with law enforcement.
Page: 183
Quote: Congress should eliminate the particular social group protected ground as vague and overbroad or, in the alternative, provide a clear definition with parameters that at a minimum codify the holding in Matter of A-B- that gang violence and domestic violence are not grounds for asylum.
Highlight: gang violence and domestic violence are not grounds for asylum
Explanation: This plan restricts asylum eligibility, potentially denying refuge to victims of gang violence and domestic violence.
Defunding Planned Parenthood
Planned Parenthood provides essential healthcare services for millions of women, including cancer screenings, contraception, and STI testing. This plan aims to eliminate all federal funding for Planned Parenthood, which would force many clinics to close and put millions of women at risk.
Page: 507
Quote: Policymakers should end taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood...and redirect funding to health centers that provide real health care for women.
Highlight: Policymakers should end taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood...and redirect funding to health centers that provide real health care for women.
Explanation: This statement falsely implies that Planned Parenthood does not provide "real health care." Planned Parenthood clinics offer essential healthcare for millions of women, including cancer screenings, contraception, and STI testing. Defunding these clinics would have a devastating impact on women's access to healthcare, particularly for lower-income women.
Page: 508
Quote: The Biden Administration restored abortion subsidies to pro-abortion NGOs including Planned Parenthood International and MSI Reproductive Choices. In reversing PLGHA, Biden declared a radical assault on the policy of protecting life, choosing instead to promote abortion on demand around the world under the guise of “sexual and reproductive health and rights.”
Highlight: restored abortion subsidies
Explanation: This implies that funding Planned Parenthood with taxpayer dollars is equivalent to "subsidizing abortion." Most federal funding that Planned Parenthood receives is barred from being used for abortion services. This argument is a tactic to defund an organization that provides crucial healthcare for millions of women.
Denying Essential Services to Immigrants
This plan proposes excluding immigrants from accessing public benefits, including housing assistance. It would create hardship for many immigrant families and could separate mixed-status families, in which some members are U.S. citizens and others are not.
Page: 180
Quote: Congress should halt funds given to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to process and transport illegal aliens into and throughout the United States.
Highlight: halt funds given to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to process and transport illegal aliens into and throughout the United States.
Explanation: NGOs play a vital role in providing humanitarian aid and legal services to immigrants, including asylum seekers. Defunding these NGOs would create hardship for vulnerable individuals and families, potentially violating their human rights.
Page: 539
Quote: The Office of the Secretary should recommence proposed regulation put forward under the Trump Administration that would prohibit noncitizens, including all mixed-status families, from living in all federally assisted housing.
Highlight: prohibit noncitizens, including all mixed-status families, from living in all federally assisted housing.
Explanation: This plan excludes noncitizens from federally subsidized housing, potentially separating families with members who have differing immigration statuses, including families with U.S. citizen children.
Undermining Democratic Institutions and Concentrating Power
Ignoring Court Decisions
This plan allows the government to disregard court decisions it doesn't like. It weakens the rule of law and undermines the system of checks and balances that is essential to a functioning democracy.
Page: 177
Quote: USCIS should make it clear that where no court jurisdiction exists, it will not honor court decisions that seek to undermine regulatory and subregulatory efforts.
Highlight: USCIS should make it clear that where no court jurisdiction exists, it will not honor court decisions that seek to undermine regulatory and subregulatory efforts.
Explanation: The rule of law demands respect for judicial decisions. This proposal encourages USCIS to ignore court rulings it disagrees with, undermining the principle of judicial review and the system of checks and balances.
Page: 106
Quote: Courts have agreed to review the consent decree if the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures setting the technical requirements for sound exams are reformed. A government that is unable to select employees based on KSA-like test qualifications cannot work, and the OPM must move forward on this very basic personnel management obligation.
Highlight: Courts have agreed to review the consent decree
Explanation: This refers to the consent decree that ended the use of discriminatory IQ tests in federal hiring. The plan aims to overturn this decree, potentially reinstating discriminatory hiring practices.
Endless Emergencies
This plan weakens the checks and balances that limit presidential power during national emergencies. It would allow presidents to declare indefinite states of emergency, potentially suspending civil liberties and expanding executive power for extended periods.
Page: 520
Quote: Restrict HHS's ability to declare indefinite public health emergencies (PHEs). Currently, HHS is merely required to notify Congress of such a declaration within 48 hours. Congress should establish a set time frame for any PHE, placing on the Secretary the burden of proof as to why an extension of the PHE is necessary.
Highlight: Congress should establish a set time frame for any PHE, placing on the Secretary the burden of proof as to why an extension of the PHE is necessary.
Explanation: This weakens existing oversight and accountability measures for public health emergencies. Under current law, Congress can vote to end a public health emergency, providing a check on executive power. This plan seeks to limit that congressional authority.
Unleashing Presidential Power over Immigration
This plan allows the President, without any approval from Congress, to implement drastic immigration restrictions and quickly deport immigrants, including asylum seekers. This would concentrate enormous power in the executive branch and create a system ripe for abuse.
Page: 184
Quote: Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act.
Highlight: the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act.
Explanation: This grants extraordinary power to the President and DHS Secretary to implement immigration bans and expulsions without congressional approval or the usual public notice-and-comment process required by the Administrative Procedures Act. This bypasses the checks and balances that are intended to prevent arbitrary and potentially unconstitutional abuses of power.
Unleashing an Unchecked FBI
This plan eliminates the 10-year term limit for the Director of the FBI, giving presidents the power to appoint and maintain loyalists in charge of a powerful and potentially unaccountable law enforcement agency.
Page: 244
Quote: The next conservative Administration should seek a legislative change to align the FBI Director's position with those of the heads of all other major departments and agencies.
Highlight: The next conservative Administration should seek a legislative change to align the FBI Director's position with those of the heads of all other major departments and agencies.
Explanation: The 10-year term limit for the FBI Director was enacted after J. Edgar Hoover's decades-long reign to prevent abuses of power and ensure accountability. Removing the term limit would give presidents the power to install and maintain loyalists at the head of the FBI, potentially turning it into a partisan political weapon.
Expanding Secret Government Operations
This plan calls for expanding and streamlining the government's ability to engage in covert actions around the world. This would reduce transparency and congressional oversight, increasing the risk of government overreach and potentially illegal activities.
Page: 243
Quote: The President should task the NSC's Senior Director for Intelligence Programs with conducting a 60-day review of any current covert action findings...and report-ing back to the President.
Highlight: conducting a 60-day review of any current covert action findings...and report-ing back to the President
Explanation: Covert actions are, by definition, secret operations conducted by the U.S. government, often involving sensitive national security interests. This proposal streamlines the review process for authorizing covert action, reducing transparency and congressional oversight, potentially increasing the risk of government overreach and illegal activities.
Silencing Congressional Oversight
This plan restricts the ability of Congress to oversee the Department of Homeland Security. It concentrates power in the executive branch, reducing transparency and accountability to elected lawmakers.
Page: 195
Quote: Because dozens of congressional committees and subcommittees either have or claim to have jurisdiction over some DHS function, DHS staff from the Secretary on down spend so much time responding to congressional hearing and briefing requests, letters, and questions for the record that they are left with little time to do their assigned job of protecting the homeland. The next President should reach an agreement with congressional leadership to limit committee jurisdiction to one authorizing committee and one appropriations committee in each chamber. If congressional leadership will not limit their committees' jurisdiction over DHS, DHS should identify one authorizing and appropriations committee in each chamber and answer only to it.
Highlight: The next President should reach an agreement with congressional leadership to limit committee jurisdiction to one authorizing committee and one appropriations committee in each chamber. If congressional leadership will not limit their committees' jurisdiction over DHS, DHS should identify one authorizing and appropriations committee in each chamber and answer only to it.
Explanation: Congressional oversight is essential for ensuring that executive branch agencies are accountable and operate within the law. This plan seeks to limit congressional oversight of a massive and powerful department, concentrating power in the executive branch and reducing transparency.
Page: 40
Quote: Instead, party leaders negotiate one multitrillion-dollar spending bill—several thousand pages long—and then vote on it before anyone, literally, has had a chance to read it. Debate time is restricted. Amendments are prohibited. And all of this is backed up against a midnight deadline when the previous “omnibus” spending bill will run out and the federal government “shuts down.
Highlight: Debate time is restricted. Amendments are prohibited.
Explanation: This plan advocates for a legislative process that limits debate and amendments, undermining congressional oversight and accountability.
Page: 249
Quote: An incoming conservative President should consider reforms designed to prevent future partisan abuses of national security authority. A package of strong provisions to protect against such partisanship might include: l Stiffer penalties and mandatory investigations when intelligence leaks are aimed at domestic political targets...
Highlight: Stiffer penalties and mandatory investigations when intelligence leaks are aimed at domestic political targets
Explanation: This would empower a conservative Administration to punish whistleblowers and suppress dissent under the guise of national security.
Dismantling Protections Against Terrorism
This plan advocates for dismantling the Department of Homeland Security, which was created after the 9/11 attacks to protect America from terrorism. This could create chaos and confusion, weakening America's security and leaving us vulnerable.
Page: 165
Quote: Our primary recommendation is that the President pursue legislation to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Highlight: that the President pursue legislation to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Explanation: DHS was established to coordinate national security efforts across different agencies and better protect America from terrorism. Eliminating it would create chaos and confusion, weakening America's security posture.
Page: 134
Quote: Our primary recommendation is that the President pursue legislation to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Highlight: dismantle the Department of Homeland Security
Explanation: This plan calls for the elimination of the Department of Homeland Security, a crucial agency responsible for protecting Americans from terrorism and other threats.
Eliminating Consumer Protections
This plan abolishes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal agency that was created after the 2008 financial crisis to protect Americans from predatory lenders. This could lead to a return to the kind of financial abuses that devastated millions of families just over a decade ago.
Page: 871
Quote: Congress should abolish the CFPB…thus returning the consumer protection function of the CFPB to banking regulators…and the Federal Trade Commission.
Highlight: Congress should abolish the CFPB…thus returning the consumer protection function of the CFPB to banking regulators…and the Federal Trade Commission.
Explanation: The CFPB was created to protect Americans from predatory lending practices after the 2008 financial crisis. Eliminating it would dismantle a critical consumer protection agency, leaving consumers vulnerable to financial abuse.
Expanding Presidential Power
The plan expands presidential power in numerous ways, including through the appointment of loyalists, the use of executive orders, and the weakening of oversight mechanisms.
Page: 54
Quote: In Chapter 1, former deputy chief of staff to the President Rick Dearborn writes that the White House Counsel “must take seriously the duty to protect the powers and privileges of the President from encroachments by Congress, the judiciary, and the administrative components of departments and agencies.”
Highlight: protect the powers and privileges of the President from encroachments by Congress, the judiciary, and the administrative components of departments and agencies
Explanation: This plan empowers the White House Counsel to protect the president's power from oversight by other branches of government.
Page: 79
Quote: The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind as it pertains to the policy agenda while always being ready with actual options to effect that agenda within existing legal authorities and resources. This role cannot be performed adequately if the Director acts instead as the ambassador of the institutional interests of OMB and the wider bureaucracy to the White House.
Highlight: The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind as it pertains to the policy agenda
Explanation: This plan designates the OMB Director as the president's proxy, effectively bypassing other agencies and their expertise.
Page: 114
Quote: Frustrated with these activities by top career executives, the Trump Administration issued Executive Order 13957 to make career professionals in positions that are not normally subject to change as a result of a presidential transition but who discharge significant duties and exercise significant discretion in formulating and implementing executive branch policy and programs an exception to the com-petitive hiring rules and examinations for career positions under a new Schedule F.
Highlight: Frustrated with these activities by top career executives, the Trump Administration issued Executive Order 13957
Explanation: This plan reinstates Trump's Schedule F executive order, giving the president more power to hire and fire career civil servants.
Isolationism and Economic Disruption
Trade War with China
This plan proposes a trade war with China, imposing extensive tariffs and restrictions on imports and investment. Not only would this raise prices for everything from clothes to electronics for ordinary Americans, but it could also lead to a wider conflict with a major nuclear power.
Page: 212
Quote: The United States must have a cost-imposing strategic response to make Bei-jing's aggression unaffordable, even as the American economy and U.S. power grow. This stance will require real, sustained, near-unprecedented U.S. growth; stronger partnerships; synchronized economic and security policies; and American energy independence—but above all, it will require a very honest perspective about the nature and designs of the PRC as more of a threat than a competitor.
Highlight: This stance will require real, sustained, near-unprecedented U.S. growth; stronger partnerships; synchronized economic and security policies; and American energy independence—but above all, it will require a very honest perspective about the nature and designs of the PRC as more of a threat than a competitor.
Explanation: This statement reflects a needlessly hostile stance toward China. While China presents economic and national security challenges, it is also America's largest trading partner. A confrontational, "cost-imposing" strategy risks a wider conflict and could harm the U.S. economy. Trade is ultimately a win-win: We benefit from affordable Chinese goods and services, and China benefits from access to our markets. A nuanced approach that combines competition with cooperation is more likely to succeed than an antagonistic one that portrays China as a purely adversarial threat.
Page: 799
Quote: Both the unfair, unbalanced, and nonreciprocal trade institutionalized by the WTO and Communist China’s economic aggression are weakening America’s man-ufacturing and defense industrial base even as the fragility of globally dispersed supply chains has been brought into sharp relief by the COVID-19 pandemic with its associated lockdowns and other disruptions and by the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Highlight: unfair, unbalanced, and nonreciprocal trade
Explanation: This statement echoes long-standing protectionist arguments that have little support in the data, potentially leading to policies that raise prices and cost jobs for Americans. The U.S. enjoys an enormous, complex, and interconnected trade relationship with China. The plan seems to ignore the potentially destructive consequences of 'decoupling.'
Turning Our Back on the World
This plan proposes withdrawing the U.S. from numerous international organizations, including the World Trade Organization, the OECD, the World Bank, and the IMF. This "America First" approach to foreign policy weakens alliances, reduces American influence in the world, and risks instability and conflict.
Page: 42
Quote: International organizations and agreements that erode our Constitution, rule of law, or popular sovereignty should not be reformed: They should be abandoned.
Highlight: They should be abandoned.
Explanation: This plan calls for withdrawing from international organizations and agreements that supposedly threaten American sovereignty. It reflects an isolationist approach to foreign policy that weakens alliances and undermines American influence in the world.
Page: 232
Quote: The United States must return to treating international organizations as vehicles for promoting American interests—or take steps to extract itself from those organizations.
Highlight: or take steps to extract itself from those organizations
Explanation: This statement reflects an "America First" approach to international organizations, suggesting they have no value unless they exclusively serve U.S. interests. It ignores the benefits of multilateral cooperation and the potential for mutual gain.
Page: 746
Quote: The U.S. should end its financial support and withdraw from the OECD.
Highlight: withdraw from the OECD
Explanation: This plan weakens U.S. involvement in international organizations by withdrawing from the OECD, potentially harming international cooperation and economic stability.
Ignoring Climate Change
This plan rejects climate change as a serious problem and calls for withdrawing from international agreements like the Paris Agreement. This would isolate the U.S. from the global community while jeopardizing the future of our planet for short-term economic gain.
Page: 35
Quote: 'Cheap grace' aptly describes the Left's love affair with environmental extrem-ism.
Highlight: 'Cheap grace' aptly describes the Left's love affair with environmental extrem-ism.
Explanation: This plan repeatedly mocks and dismisses concerns about climate change as "extremism" and "fanaticism." This reflects a disregard for the scientific consensus about the dangers of climate change and the urgency of addressing it.
Page: 741
Quote: The next conservative Administration should withdraw the U.S. from the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change74 and the Paris Agreement.
Highlight: The next conservative Administration should withdraw the U.S. from the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change74 and the Paris Agreement.
Explanation: Withdrawing from these agreements would isolate the U.S. from the international community and damage our global standing. It would also signal that the Administration does not take climate change seriously.
Page: 40
Quote: Bureaucrats at the Environmental Protection Agency quietly strangles domestic energy production through difficult-to-understand rulemaking processes
Highlight: Bureaucrats at the Environmental Protection Agency quietly strangles domestic energy production
Explanation: This statement mischaracterizes the EPA’s vital role in protecting the environment as an attack on domestic energy production.
Page: 94
Quote: The President should instruct the CEQ to rewrite its regulations implementing NEPA along the lines of the historic 2020 effort and restoring its key provisions such as banning the use of cumulative impact analysis.
Highlight: banning the use of cumulative impact analysis
Explanation: This plan weakens the National Environmental Policy Act by eliminating cumulative impact analysis, making it easier for projects to avoid environmental review.
Page: 474
Quote: Reject funds for programs that have not been authorized by Congress (like IRIS) as well as peer review activities that have not been authorized by Congress.
Highlight: Reject funds for programs that have not been authorized by Congress (like IRIS)
Explanation: This plan eliminates funding for the Integrated Risk Information System, a key EPA program that evaluates the health risks of chemicals.
Blocking Clean Energy
This plan seeks to limit the growth of clean, renewable energy and increase dependence on fossil fuels, despite growing concerns about climate change and energy security. It would benefit oil and gas companies at the expense of American families and our environment.
Page: 45
Quote: The next conservative President should go beyond merely defending America's energy interests but go on offense, asserting them around the world.
Highlight: The next conservative President should go beyond merely defending America's energy interests but go on offense, asserting them around the world.
Explanation: This implies an aggressive approach to promoting American energy interests internationally that could alienate allies and harm the environment. It ignores the benefits of developing alternative, clean energy sources and reducing U.S. dependence on fossil fuels.
Page: 300
Quote: The Biden Administration's extreme climate policies have cut off billions in investment to develop clean fossil fuels, denying Africa's billion-plus people access to cheap energy to further their own development...
Highlight: The Biden Administration's extreme climate policies have cut off billions in investment to develop clean fossil fuels
Explanation: This statement is false and misleading. The Biden Administration has made significant investments in clean energy, both domestically and abroad. This statement distorts the Administration's policies for political purposes. In reality, under the Biden Administration, the U.S. has been the largest producer of both renewable and fossil fuel energy in the world.
Dismantling the Administrative State, Weakening Services, and Hurting Ordinary Americans
Gutting Federal Agencies
This plan calls for reducing the size, budget, and scope of numerous federal agencies and departments. This includes proposals to eliminate the Department of Homeland Security, defund the Internal Revenue Service, weaken environmental protections, and shrink workforce development programs. These changes would make government less effective, more bureaucratic, and less able to serve Americans. It would harm public safety, economic security, and environmental protection, putting everyday people at risk.
Page: 40
Quote: Unaccountable federal spending is the secret lifeblood of the Great Awokening. Nearly every power center held by the Left is funded or supported, one way or another, through the bureaucracy by Congress. Colleges and school districts are funded by tax dollars. The Administrative State holds 100 percent of its power at the sufferance of Congress, and its insulation from presidential discipline is an unconstitutional fairy tale spun by the Washington Establishment to protect its turf. Members of Congress shield themselves from constitutional accountability often when the White House allows them to get away with it. Cultural institutions like public libraries and public health agencies are only as “independent” from public accountability as elected officials and voters permit.
Highlight: Unaccountable federal spending is the secret lifeblood of the Great Awokening. Nearly every power center held by the Left is funded or supported, one way or another, through the bureaucracy by Congress.
Explanation: This statement demonizes federal spending and government agencies, suggesting that they are the tools of a nefarious "Great Awokening." This is inflammatory and misleading. Public institutions serve everyone, including the most vulnerable, and a healthy society needs a government that can perform its vital duties effectively.
Page: 732
Quote: The operating budget of the IRS should be held constant in real terms.
Highlight: held constant in real terms
Explanation: This plan effectively cuts IRS funding, making it harder to process returns, provide taxpayer assistance, and investigate tax evasion.
Page: 746
Quote: The U.S. should end its financial support and withdraw from the OECD.
Highlight: withdraw from the OECD
Explanation: This weakens the United States’ voice in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, a vital international organization that helps coordinate global economic policy.
Page: 52
Quote: fundamentally transformed, largely through a centralized administrative state
Highlight:
Explanation: This statement frames the administrative state as an enemy of the American people, justifying radical changes to its structure and function.
Replacing Expert Decisions with Presidential Whims
This plan empowers the President to ignore the expertise of career civil servants and agency experts and substitute his own preferences. It undermines the institutional knowledge and professional capabilities of federal departments and agencies.
Page: 79
Quote: The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind as it pertains to the policy agenda while always being ready with actual options to effect that agenda within existing legal authorities and resources. This role cannot be performed adequately if the Director acts instead as the ambassador of the institutional interests of OMB and the wider bureaucracy to the White House.
Highlight: The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind as it pertains to the policy agenda
Explanation: This plan designates the OMB Director as the president's proxy, effectively bypassing other agencies and their expertise.
Repealing Common Sense Worker Protections
This plan seeks to weaken or repeal worker protections, including the 40-hour work week and workplace safety standards. It also aims to weaken the rights of workers to organize and engage in collective bargaining. This would lead to more precarious employment conditions, reduce wages, and benefit large corporations at the expense of ordinary workers.
Page: 621
Quote: Congress should amend the FLSA to clarify that an employer’s expenses in providing on-site childcare are not part of an employee’s regular rate of pay.
Highlight: not part of an employee’s regular rate of pay
Explanation: This loophole would enable employers to avoid paying workers time-and-a-half for overtime, lowering wages and incentivizing businesses to demand more work from employees.
Page: 625
Quote: l Congress should amend the NLRA to authorize collective bargaining to treat national employment laws and regulations as negotiable defaults. For example, this reform would allow a union to bless a relaxed overtime trigger (e.g., 45 hours a week, or 80 hours over two weeks) in exchange for firm employer commitments on predictable scheduling.
Highlight: allow a union to bless a relaxed overtime trigger
Explanation: This weakens existing worker protections, opening the possibility for workers to be forced into working more hours without overtime pay.
Defunding Social Programs That Fight Hunger
This plan includes proposals to restrict SNAP eligibility, reform WIC, and return school meals to their 'original purpose.' These changes would likely limit access to food for the most vulnerable, including children, pregnant women, and families struggling to make ends meet.
Page: 332
Quote: Move the USDA food and nutrition programs to the Department of Health and Human Services.
Highlight: Move the USDA food and nutrition programs to the Department of Health and Human Services
Explanation: This plan would move food and nutrition programs, such as SNAP (food stamps), to a department already struggling to manage its existing programs, potentially leading to cuts and delays for millions of Americans.
Page: 337
Quote: The next Administration should: l Promulgate a rule properly interpreting CEP. The USDA should issue a rule that clarifies that only an individual school or a school district as a whole, not a subset of schools within a district, must meet the 40-percent criteria to be eligible for CEP. Education officials should be prohibited from grouping schools together.
Highlight: Education officials should be prohibited from grouping schools together.
Explanation: This plan restricts schools’ ability to participate in the Community Eligibility Provision, which provides free meals to all students in lower-income schools.
Eroding Public Education and Teacher Rights
This plan promotes school choice programs that would divert taxpayer dollars from public schools and would also weaken public education through unnecessary changes to federal oversight, curriculum regulations, and funding. It would reduce educational opportunities for many children, and it could threaten the livelihoods and job security of dedicated public school teachers. This plan also undermines teacher unions, which have fought to protect worker rights and public education. Furthermore, the NEA already discloses information about its spending, and charter revocation is unprecedented in modern times. This tactic, which will do nothing to improve education for any American, will only be used by a desperate president as a partisan cudgel.
Page: 319
Quote: Schools should be responsive to parents, rather than to leftist advocates intent on indoctrination—and the more the federal government is involved in education, the less responsive to parents the public schools will be.
Highlight: Schools should be responsive to parents, rather than to leftist advocates intent on indoctrination
Explanation: This statement mischaracterizes legitimate educational goals and practices as "leftist indoctrination" to justify a parental rights agenda that undermines public education.
Page: 376
Quote: l Congress should rescind the National Education Association’s congressional charter and remove the false impression that federal taxpayers support the political activities of this special interest group.
Highlight: rescind the National Education Association’s congressional charter and remove the false impression that federal taxpayers support the political activities of this special interest group.
Explanation: This plan unfairly attacks and seeks to weaken the National Education Association, the nation's largest labor union.
Page: 380
Quote: Federal lawmakers should offer District students the opportunity to use education savings accounts. A portion of a child’s federal education spending should be deposited in a private spending account that parents can use to pay for personal tutors, education therapists, books and curricular materials, private school tuition, transportation and more—accounts modeled after the accounts in Arizona, Florida, West Virginia, and seven other states.
Highlight: A portion of a child’s federal education spending should be deposited in a private spending account that parents can use to pay for... private school tuition
Explanation: This plan diverts public education funds to private schools through education savings accounts, weakening public education and benefiting wealthier families.
Page: 394
Quote: Congress should pass and the next President should sign a Department of Education Reorganization Act.
Highlight: Congress should pass and the next President should sign a Department of Education Reorganization Act.
Explanation: This plan calls for the elimination of the Department of Education, a democratically established agency, without offering a clear alternative for its vital functions.
Weakening Workplace Safety
This plan cuts funding for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and undermines workplace safety, potentially leading to more injuries, illnesses, and deaths for American workers.
Page: 630
Quote: l Congress (and DOL, in its enforcement discretion) should exempt small business, first-time, non-willful violators from fines issued by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration.
Highlight: exempt small business, first-time, non-willful violators from fines issued by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration.
Explanation: This creates loopholes for employers who put their workers at risk by failing to follow workplace safety regulations, undermining OSHA's enforcement capabilities and increasing the likelihood of workplace injury, illness, and death.
Doubling Down on Harmful Economic Policies
Continuing the Trade War
Despite clear evidence that the trade war has failed, this plan supports protectionist trade policies, including tariffs and restrictions on imports and investment. These policies benefit a small number of industries at the expense of American consumers and businesses.
Page: 700
Quote: Many free trade advocates consider antidumping and countervailing duty laws (AD/CVD) to be protectionist and thus antithetical to the conservative free market position. In their view, AD/CVD laws are overused, abused by certain industries, and harmful to American economic competitiveness by increasing costs to down-stream industries.
Highlight: AD/CVD laws are overused, abused by certain industries, and harmful to American economic competitiveness by increasing costs to down-stream industries
Explanation: This plan would continue the Trump Administration’s protectionist policies, raising costs for American businesses and consumers.
Page: 799
Quote: Both the unfair, unbalanced, and nonreciprocal trade institutionalized by the WTO and Communist China’s economic aggression are weakening America’s man-ufacturing and defense industrial base even as the fragility of globally dispersed supply chains has been brought into sharp relief by the COVID-19 pandemic with its associated lockdowns and other disruptions and by the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Highlight: unfair, unbalanced, and nonreciprocal trade
Explanation: This statement echoes long-standing protectionist arguments that have little support in the data, potentially leading to policies that raise prices and cost jobs for Americans. The U.S. enjoys an enormous, complex, and interconnected trade relationship with China. The plan seems to ignore the potentially destructive consequences of 'decoupling.'
Expanding Taxpayer Risks
This plan expands the government's risk by advocating for additional subsidies and taxpayer-backed guarantees and loosening underwriting standards for lending programs.
Page: 724
Quote: The next Administration must act decisively to curtail activities that fall outside of Treasury’s mandate and primary mission. Treasury must refocus on its core missions of promoting economic growth, prosperity, and economic stability.
Highlight: must refocus on its core missions of promoting economic growth, prosperity, and economic stability.
Explanation: These "core missions" are often interpreted as justification for increased taxpayer risk, as we saw with the expansion of the U.S. Export–Import Bank.
Page: 751
Quote: EXIM operates in effect as a protectionist agency that picks winners and losers in the market by providing political privileges to firms that are already well-financed. By doing so, it risks taxpayer funds as it stymies economic growth.
Highlight: it risks taxpayer funds as it stymies economic growth
Explanation: EXIM financing often underwrites projects that private lenders will not. This statement ignores the bank’s role in bolstering America’s competitive edge and risks harming economic growth without mitigating any downside for taxpayers.
Gutting Public Pensions
This plan pushes for significant reforms to public pension plans, using accounting changes that dramatically inflate their liabilities. This could lead to cuts in pension benefits for retired public employees.
Page: 643
Quote: l Disclose the fair market value of plan assets and liabilities. Congress should require public pension funds to disclose the fair market value of plan assets and liabilities (using the Treasury yield curve as the discount rate) on an annual basis.
Highlight: (using the Treasury yield curve as the discount rate)
Explanation: This change in accounting requirements is being pushed by organizations like the American Legislative Exchange Council, an interest group that represents big corporations and has worked to diminish worker benefits and bargaining power. It would vastly inflate the unfunded liabilities of many public pension programs, which could then be used by governors and state lawmakers to justify cuts in public employee benefits.
Risky and Untested Economic and Fiscal Policies
This plan promotes risky and untested economic policies, including tax cuts for the wealthy, deregulation, a return to the gold standard, and abolishing the Federal Reserve.
Page: 730
Quote: The estate and gift tax should be reduced to no higher than 20 percent, and the 2017 tax bill’s temporary increase in the exemption amount from $5.5 million to $12.9 million (adjusted for inflation) should be made permanent.
Highlight: The estate and gift tax should be reduced to no higher than 20 percent
Explanation: This proposal for reforming the estate tax—often termed the "death tax"—would further skew the federal tax code away from wealthier Americans and increase inequality by creating a loophole for heirs to avoid paying taxes on inheritances, adding billions to the national debt over the years.
Page: 732
Quote: The operating budget of the IRS should be held constant in real terms.
Highlight: held constant in real terms
Explanation: This plan would effectively cut IRS funding, hindering its ability to enforce tax laws and potentially leading to increased tax evasion.
Page: 772
Quote: Given this track record, restoring a gold standard retains some appeal among monetary reformers who do not wish to go so far as abolishing the Federal Reserve.
Highlight: restoring a gold standard
Explanation: This plan considers a return to the gold standard, a risky and untested monetary policy that could lead to economic instability.
Page: 770
Quote: In free banking, neither interest rates nor the supply of money is controlled by the government. The Federal Reserve is effectively abolished, and the Department of the Treasury largely limits itself to handling the government’s money.
Highlight: In free banking, neither interest rates nor the supply of money is controlled by the government. The Federal Reserve is effectively abolished
Explanation: This proposal for “free banking” calls for the complete abolition of the Federal Reserve System, which has served the nation well for over a century. Eliminating the Fed is an extremist position unsupported by mainstream economists that would unleash economic chaos and destabilize America’s financial system. A stable, sound currency managed by responsible government actors is essential to long-term prosperity.